On the Budget II

Here's the follow up talk from President Packer on the budget issue, given just two days after his landmark talk to the Regional Representatives.  I find it interesting that the first was "Let Them Govern Themselves" and this was "Teach Them Correct Principles".  I guess they probably should have been reversed...

Teach Them Correct Principles

Elder Boyd K. Packer
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

Boyd K. Packer, “Teach Them Correct Principles,” Ensign, May 1990, 89

At the first of the year, an announcement went out that had a major effect on the budgeting of the Church. It related to the activities and operation expenses of the local units being paid for henceforth from the tithes and offerings of the Church.

It is the purpose of this meeting to give you a feeling for the reason for the changes in that budgeting procedure.

We are confident that when you understand the spirit and purpose of the change, most of the detailed questions will be resolved. We are following the admonition of the Prophet Joseph Smith: “I teach them correct principles and they govern themselves.” (Messages of the First Presidency, comp. James R. Clark, 6 vols., Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965–75, 3:54.) We should not, according to the scriptures, need to be commanded in all things. (See D&C 58:26.)

Most of the deciding must be left to you, the members of the Church, acting in harmony with the principles announced in the guidelines. The change will require some considerable adjustment in our thinking. It will not be possible to do all of the things we have been doing in the same way we have been doing them. It will bring an inevitable reduction in programs. That was intended. There will need to be some “pick and choose.” Nothing essential will be lost; rather, essential things will be rediscovered, be found!

The Effect Will Be Spiritual

We have been taught that tithing is not so much a matter of money as a matter of faith. While the change in budgets and assessments and fund-raising may seem at first to be a temporal matter, the effect of it will be spiritual.

Already we hear priesthood and auxiliary leaders commenting with keen insight that this change turns us more directly to spiritual matters. They are beginning to see that, in effect, this announcement has more to do with spirit than with money. You will become more dependent upon the Spirit and more in need of personal revelation when the decisions are left to you.

Some Few “Resourceful” Leaders

We have also heard of some very clever inventions calculated to circumvent the instructions and maintain some of the expensive, even extravagant, activities to which we have become accustomed.

Those resourceful souls will have cause to repent once they understand the spirit of the decision. Those clever practices will soon fade as you learn the purpose for it all.
A Surprise

To many, the announcement came as a surprise, a very welcome surprise, and yet if you had been listening carefully, you should not have been too surprised.

For years, Presidents of the Church have talked of and prayed for the day when tithes and offerings would qualify members for full participation in the Church.

President Joseph F. Smith, as early as 1907, stated, “We may not be able to reach it right away, but we expect to see the day when we will not have to ask you for one dollar of donation for any purpose, except that which you volunteer to give of your own accord, because we will have tithes sufficient in the storehouse of the Lord to pay everything that is needful for the advancement of the kingdom of God.” (In Conference Report, Apr. 1907, p. 7.)

The First Presidency has counseled us again and again:

“Dear Brethren and Sisters,” they wrote, “we are seriously concerned over the demands made upon the people of the Church in carrying forward its many programs. We are most anxious that these requirements not become so heavy as to have an adverse effect on family life, vocational pursuits, or the pursuit of needed educational undertakings. We are also concerned about the financial requests made upon our people.… We have reason to feel that these requirements are becoming unduly burdensome for many.”

That was printed in the Priesthood Bulletin in 1978, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1987—five times!

The First Presidency sent yet another letter entitled “Reduction of Time and Money Required for Church Programs.” I will read from it.

“We are very anxious that the cost of participation in Church activities not become unduly burdensome to our members. There is concern lest some who are not able to meet these costs may withdraw themselves from full participation in the Church. Particularly the youth programs of the Church should be so managed that all of our young people may enjoy full participation.” (Letter to stake presidents, bishops, and branch presidents, 2 May 1978.)

Time an Issue

Did you notice that each of those statements called for a reduction in both time and money required of members?

“I have told you many times,” President Brigham Young said, “the property which we inherit from our Heavenly Father is our time, and the power to choose in the disposition of the same. This is the real capital that is bequeathed unto us by our Heavenly Father.” (In Journal of Discourses, 18:354; italics added.)

Some of you have asked why this change should come just when the forces of temptation are surrounding our youth as never before. You ask, “Do we not need more impressive activities and more meetings, rather than fewer?”

Sometimes more can be less, and sometimes less is more. Even with all we expend and all we do, we are not doing as well as we should and have little evidence that the expensive activities really secure our youth.

There is a lesson, a profound lesson, in the Book of Mormon. In Jacob’s parable of the olive tree, the lord of the vineyard wept because he had worked so hard but the trees brought forth wild fruit. “What could I have done more?” he asked. “Have I slackened my hand, that I have not nourished it, and digged about it and pruned it and stretched forth mine hand almost all day long? What could I have done more for my vineyard?” (See Jacob 5:47.)

How many bishops with disappointing results have felt to say those very words in their souls? “What could I have done more for my ward? Why wild fruit after all our work?”

It was the servant—it always is the servant—who said, “Is it not the loftiness of thy vineyard—have not the branches thereof overcome the roots which are good? And because the branches have overcome the roots thereof, behold they grew faster than the strength of the roots, taking strength unto themselves.” (Jacob 5:48.)

“Nevertheless,” the lord of the vineyard said, “I know that the roots are good.” (Jacob 5:36; italics added.) Then he brought cuttings from the trees he had planted in poor ground, for he found them to be strong; and grafted them in that “the root and the top may be equal in strength.” (Jacob 5:66.)

There is great meaning in Jacob’s parable for the Church in our generation.

Meetings and activities can multiply until they take “strength unto themselves” at the expense of the gospel—of true worship.

This change in budgeting will have the effect of returning much of the responsibility for teaching and counseling and activity to the family where it belongs. While there will still be many activities, they will be scaled down in cost of both time and money. There will be fewer intrusions into family schedules and in the family purses.

Church activities must be replaced by family activities. Just as we have been taught with temporal affairs, the spirit of independence, thrift, and self-reliance will be re-enthroned as guiding principles in the homes of Latter-day Saints.

And, just as stake leaders now will sponsor fewer activities, leaving more of the time and money to ward leaders, ward leaders in turn will leave more of both to the families.

This decision will set a better balance between families being assessed time and money to support Church activities and Church activities complementing what families should do for themselves.

That is a difficult balance because some families need more support than others. Perhaps we have been over-programming stable families to meet the needs of those with problems. We must seek a better way.

I can see parents grateful indeed to have a better balance with activities on Saturdays. Saturday activities can be scheduled to allow our youth to have their activities but on occasion to be home on some Saturdays to be taught how to work, to help, to learn to find recreation in the family setting. And the moms and dads who have obediently left home to oversee Church activities can find more time with their own children.

President Kimball said, “This is a shocking thing to me … to come to a realization of what we have been attempting to do, all with the best of intentions.” He said the cost of membership in both time and money was “becoming prohibitive for the members of the Church, and they find it very difficult and sometimes we lose the members of the Church because they do not want to admit they cannot afford the things we expect.” (“Reduction and Simplification,” 13 Apr. 1979.)

It is my personal conviction that this change in budgeting will have enormous reactivating influence on those who have held back because they could not afford the cost of Church activities.

Consider parents struggling under the pressure of providing all that a growing family requires. Can you not see them being less firm in pressing their children to attend Church activities when they really can’t afford the costs? When we press them too hard, we infer that they aren’t good enough providers. If you understand the human ego at all, you will know parents will withdraw from activity rather than say they can’t afford the cost.

Can you see a seventeen-year-old boy overhearing his mother on the phone saying: “Yes, yes, I know. We will try to make a partial payment next month. I know we did, but we just didn’t have it. We’ve had some medical expenses. Yes, I understand that. We just have not been able to do it. Oh, please, don’t do that. If you take it, it will be impossible for my husband to get to work. Please, can’t you give us a little more time?”

Question: Will that boy sign up for an expensive youth camp or conference, no matter how desperately he wants to go? Will he attend regularly if every activity requires “just a few dollars”? The money he can supposedly earn to pay his own way may have more pressing uses.

You may say we can provide for him. Careful about that human ego! Remember, we have already been teaching him and his parents to be independent, thrifty, and self-reliant.

Question: Will that boy go on a mission? I have known young men who have thought to disqualify themselves rather than to put what they feel is an impossible financial burden upon the family with perhaps the mother leaving younger children to find work to support him on his mission.

Now funds which have been spent on these things may be salted away for missions. Can you not see that this saving commitment can have a very protective moral and spiritual influence upon a young man, in some ways more powerful than one more exciting youth activity? It can indeed be a “saving” commitment.

The scriptures speak of tithes and of offerings; they do not speak of assessments or fund-raising. To be an offering, it must be given freely—offered. The way is open now for many more of us to participate in this spiritually refining experience.

Some of you know families overburdened with missionary and other expenses. Offer to help. The bishop can act as intermediary, and you can give the anonymous gift. What a privilege. It has to be done carefully, lest we undo the self-reliant part.

You must devise ways of letting those who have drawn back because of expense know about the change. They weren’t in the meeting when the announcement was made. Send your youth out to call them back.

Tell them what the prophet said:

“Come, my brethren, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters; and he that hath no money, come buy and eat; yea, come buy wine and milk without money and without price.” (2 Ne. 9:50; italics added.)

For those who can and are willing, there comes the opportunity to make generous offerings. In leaving decisions to you, do you not see the fundamental doctrine of moral agency asserting itself? Do you not see the change from assessment to offering something of the testing which is fundamental to our mortal probation?

I have thought much lately of the other prophet Joseph, who interpreted the dream of the pharaoh. I have thought of the seven years of plenty and a time to prepare before the years of famine.

I have thought of a pharaoh humble enough to heed the counsel of a prophet and of a people who were saved because of it. I have thought of a family that was united—the family of Israel.

I could not express to you, my brethren and sisters, the depths of my feeling about what has been announced. It is a course correction; it is an inspired move. It will have influence upon the Church across the world, not just in our generation, but in the generations to come. I have the certain conviction that it is pleasing to him who is our Lord and our Redeemer, even Jesus Christ, our Savior. In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

On the Budget

Obviously, I did not ever hear this talk, but I heard the one President Packer refers to early in this talk, and it was groundbreaking.  I have strong feelings about the budget and the proverbial "widow's mite", and President Packer does a great job outlining why the budget was changed.  I will also post the follow up talk he gave in conference immediately after this.

Let Them Govern Themselves

    Address delivered by Elder Boyd K. Packer
    Regional Representative Seminar
    Friday, March 30, 1990

    The Lord said, "Behold, I will hasten my work in its time. And I give unto you, who are the first laborers in this last kingdom, a commandment that you. . . organize yourselves, and prepare yourselves, and sanctify yourselves; yea, purify your hearts, and cleanse your hands and your feet before me, that I may make you clean." (D&C 88:73-74)

    In the last period of time, since the October conference, the Quorum of the Twelve has been following that admonition against the obvious hastening that is taking place; the unprecedented, miraculous changing of the circumstances across the world. Nations, in a sense are being born in a day and the invitation now is for our missionaries to move into countries where we have no members and to move into countries where we have had members who have lived under almost impossible circumstances. This hastening has been the source of sobering reflection and we of the Twelve, under the direction of President Hunter, have held many meetings, over viewing and calling into attention things of the past; looking at our circumstances at the present, and looking into the future as is not only our calling, but our responsibility as prophets, seers, and revelators.

    We have held meetings with the First Presidency and I think the theme that you have felt in this meeting and will feel from the conference and will see as the conference concludes with momentous events having occurred, that we need now to prepare ourselves and to put on the new man and the new woman, to change a mind-set and to move into the future that the Lord is preparing for us.

    Recent letters announced the decision to fund the Church henceforth from tithes and offerings. As has been mentioned here two or three times today, other collections, assessments, and fund-raising, with a few and perhaps temporary exceptions, are to be discontinued.

    In a recent satellite broadcast that was viewed here in the United States and Canada, the principles and doctrines which should govern the change were presented. While three men spoke, it was a single message. Since those talks were distributed or will reach you where translation is necessary, I will present but a brief quote, one from each of the counselors in the First Presidency which embody the spirit of the instruction.

    President Monson:

• "The budget allowance program was created to reduce financial burdens on members.
• Members should not pay fees or be assessed to participate in Church programs.
• Priesthood leaders should reduce and simplify activities wherever possible.
• Let me repeat: Priesthood leaders should reduce and simplify activities wherever possible.
• Activities should be planned at little or no cost, should build testimonies and provide meaningful service to others."

    And then he added: "It is the desire that restraint be used in programming youth activities and that consistency between young women and young men programs be achieved." (Thomas S. Monson, satellite broadcast, 18 Feb. 1990)

    President Hinckley

"Perhaps we have gone to far" this is the roller coaster President Monson referred to earlier "in providing for some beyond what is needed or what is best in terms of the individuals and their families.

"It should be recognized the this Church is not a social club. This is the Kingdom of God in the earth. It is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Its purpose is to bring salvation and exaltation to both the living and the dead.

"These officers and teachers, and these young men and women, are people of ingenuity who with faith and prayer can work out programs costing little in dollars that will yield tremendous dividends in wholesome recreation and faith-building activities. Perhaps we should be less concerned with fun and more with faith." (Gordon B. Hinckley, satellite broadcast 18 Feb. 1990)

    This change, announced for the United States and Canada, will, by successive steps, be implemented worldwide. I repeat, just as soon as the procedures can be worked out and some experience gained, it will be implemented across the world.

    To many, it is just a welcome relief, a change in procedure a relatively small thing.

    It was the prophet Alma who told us "that by small and simple things are great things brought to pass. . .And the Lord God doth work by (small) means to bring about his great and eternal purposes" (Alma 37:6-7).

    To me this "small thing" is among the major decisions that I shall have witnessed in my lifetime. I will attempt to explain to you why my conviction of its importance is so fixed.

Like a Team of Doctors

    In recent years we might be compared to a team of doctors issuing prescriptions to cure or to immunize our members against spiritual diseases. Each time some moral or spiritual ailment was diagnosed, we have rushed to the pharmacy to concoct another remedy, encapsulate it as a program and send it out with pages of directions for use.

    While we all seem to agree that over medication, over-programming, is a critically serious problem, we have failed to reduce the treatments. It has been virtually impossible to affect any reduction in programs.

    Each time we try, advocates cry to high heaven that we are putting the spiritual lives of our youth at risk. If symptoms reappear, we program even heavier doses of interviews, activities, meetings, and assessments.

    The best answer, perhaps is to withdraw all prescriptions and start over. The whole correlation effort, which took about twenty years, followed that course and much was accomplished. The habits for moral and spiritual health were defined. The scriptures were prescribed as the basic nourishment. The curriculum, loaded with spiritual nutrients, was developed but we did not allow time for it to work and we failed to close the pharmacy or even effectively control it.

    We now have ourselves in a corner. For instance, we have reason to be seriously concerned about the lack of reverence in the Church. Perhaps this one thing, general across the world, is as much an interference with and a short-circuiting of inspiration as anything that could be pointed to. However, I dare not press for the corrections of that issue because we do not seem to be able to solve a problem without designing a program with pages of instruction and sending it out again.

    It is time now for you who head the auxiliaries and the departments and those of us who advise them, after all the repetitive cautions from the First Presidency, to change our mind-set and realize that a reduction of and a secession from that constant programming must be accomplished.

    The hardest ailment to treat is a virtue carried to the extreme. We cannot seem to learn that too much, even of a good thing, or too many good things, like vitamins taken in overdose, can be harmful.

    In recent years I have felt, and I think I am not alone, that we were losing the ability to correct the course of the Church. You cannot appreciate how deeply I feel about the importance of this present opportunity unless you know the regard, the reverence, I have for the Book of Mormon and how seriously I have taken the warnings of the prophets, particularly Alma and Helaman.

    Both Alma and Helaman told of the church in their day. They warned about fast growth, the desire to be accepted by the world, to be popular, and particularly they warned about prosperity. Each time those conditions existed in combination, the Church drifted off course. All of those conditions are present in the Church today.

    Helaman repeatedly warned, I think four times he used these words, that the fatal drift of the church could occur "in the space of not many years." In one instance it took only six years. (See Helaman 6:32, 7:6, 11:26)

    The announcement of tithes and offerings, which has been sent now, is of such enormous importance because, perhaps for one time only, we have an opportunity in one sweeping stroke, to correct much of what heretofore we have been unable to correct.

    The revelations tell us that there are limits to what mankind will be allowed to do. When those limits are reached, then comes destruction. And, the patience of the Lord with all of us who are in leadership positions, is not without limits.

Regimentation

    The most dangerous side effect of all we have prescribed in the way of programming and instructions and all is the over regimentation of the Church. This over regimentation is a direct result of too many programmed instructions. If we would compare the handbooks of today with those of a generation ago you would quickly see what I mean. And Brother Hanks mentioned that the Melchizedek Priesthood Handbook is an amalgamation of several handbooks and a reduction of them all with, I think, nothing lost; much gained.

    "Teach them correct principles," the prophet said, "and then let," let--a big word, "them govern themselves." (See messages of the Firsts Presidency, p. 54.) Our members should not, according to the scriptures, need to be commanded in all things. (See D&C 58:26)

    Local leaders have been effectively conditioned to hold back until programmed as to what to do, how, to whom, when, and for how long. Can you see that when we overemphasize programs at the expense of principles, we are in danger of losing the inspiration, the resourcefulness, that which should characterize Latter-day Saints. Then the very principle of individual revelation is in jeopardy and we drift from a fundamental gospel principle!

    "Adam fell that men might be: and men are, that they might have joy." That much-quoted verse in the book of Mormon is followed by this one:

    "And the Messiah cometh in the fullness of time, that he may redeem the children of men from the fall. And because that they are redeemed from the fall they have become free forever, knowing good from evil; to act for themselves and not to be acted upon." (2 Nephi 2:25-26)

    My feeling about our present opportunity with this change in funding is based on doctrine. For generations we have taught that the temporal salivation of the Saints depends upon independence, industry, thrift, and self-reliance. We would never stray from that in teaching about temporal things.

    On the other hand, it is possible that we are doing the very thing spiritually that we have been resolutely resisting temporally; fostering dependence rather than independence, extravagance rather than thrift, indulgence rather than self-reliance.

    We send two diverging signals and the Lord has told us: "if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand" (Mark 3:25).

    It is not that any one thing we have been doing is wrong, for we have acted with the best of intentions. Some of us remember when President Kimball saw the outlay of curriculum and the vast display of printed material. He said he was frightened, "We have done it all with the best intentions." It is just that we can do far too much of good things. One or two reports of inactivity or extreme behavior and we rush to make corrections across the whole Church with more programs, more interviews, more assessments.

Risks Involved

    This change will cause a reduction in programs and activities; that we intended. I quickly admit that there are risks involved when we simplify instructions or loosen up on regimentation. It is no different than what we face when our own children begin to mature and venture out into the world. Wise parents loosen the apron strings and help children to leave the nest to start anew the cycle of mortal life.

    If we teach them correct principles rather than overburdening them with too many instructions and programmed activities, they can be both free and spiritually safe in any nation, among any people, in any age. If we indulge them too much, or make them too dependent, we weaken them morally, then they will be compelled by nature itself to find the wrong way.

    The only safe course is to make sure that they know the gospel, that they are acquainted with the scriptures, with revelation, with repentance, with how the Holy Ghost functions, with the voice of the Spirit.

    A knowledge of right and wrong does not automatically result from programmed activities. It must be taught.

We Need to be Temperate

    We need a sensible balancing of and a careful withdrawal of this medication of over programming. It can begin simply by restraining ourselves from writing more prescriptions, and by counseling local leaders not to replace the ones we phase out. So, the problem Regional Representatives! There will be the tendency, we have seen it already when we began to phase out and withdraw, for the local leaders, conditioned as they are, to want to use that time and build up more detailed programs on their own.

    We must use great care and be temperate. There are always those who will go to the extreme and want to cancel all activities. That is not what I am talking about, not at all. I am talking about a careful course correction.

    There are always those who cry for a lifting of all the rules and regulations and laws and restraints. Always they claim that the doctrine of free agency demands that.

Moral Agency

    The agency the Lord has given us is not a "free" agency. The term "free" agency is not found in the revelations. It is a moral agency. The Lord has given us freedom of choice:

    "That every man may act in doctrine and principle pertaining to futurity, according to the moral agency which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgment." (D&C 101:78)

    There is no agency without choice; there is no choice without freedom; there is no freedom without risk; nor true freedom without responsibility.

    This change in budgeting will have the effect of returning much of the responsibility for teaching and counseling and activities to the family where it belongs. There will be fewer intrusions into the family schedules and into the family purses.

    It will set a better balance between families being assessed time and money to support Church activities, and Church activities complementing what families should do for themselves and backing away to an extent so they can do it. That is, if all of us will understand and will do it.

    I repeat, perhaps for one time only we have the opportunity to adjust that balance so that Church activities sustain parents and families rather than the other way around.

    Now, there will be smaller budgets and fewer activities, fewer programs. That will leave a vacuum. Nothing likes a vacuum.

    We must resist, absolutely resist, the temptation to program that vacuum. That space belongs to families. When we cut down on Sundays to the block plan that consolidated our meetings and left some time open, you know what happened. Now brethren, it is their time. Let them use it as they feel to do -- for better or for worse. That is the risk. If we fail to teach them correct principles, teach them the doctrine, they will not know how to govern themselves.

    If we do, then that vacuum will be filled with prayer and work and study, study for school, for instance, study the gospel. It will be filled with faith and reverence. It will be filled with the intimate love between husband and wife, with the tender love of parents to children. There will come a safe and virtuous dependency. Latter-day Saints will come to depend upon the Lord instead of upon the headquarters of the Church.

    We are in mortality to receive a mortal body, to be tested, to prepare for Godhood. There is no testing without choice. Please, for this one time, honor the agency of the members, the families.

Reorientation of Thinking

    This change has given me renewed hope. It will require some considerable adjustment in our thinking and a change in deeply ingrained habits.

    What we do we must do wisely, temperately. We can effect a course correction and we will see the Church delivered safely to the next generation. And then we can move into these developing nations with the gospel of Jesus Christ.

    It is my personal conviction, I think it is obvious, that this change in budgeting will have enormous reactivation influence on those who have held back because they could not afford the cost of Church activities.

    Stake leaders now must sponsor fewer activities, leaving most of the time and money to ward leaders. We have had reports, for instance, of stake presidents that, in one case, want to keep 65% of the allotments so that they can continue with their stake activities and leave the wards to themselves. Now, will you Regional Representatives watch that, to see that budgets are shifted down to the wards. It will need your attention. Ward leaders in turn, by this action, will be leaving more of both time and money to the families.

    Another point. Some of us have missed the point that this is a reduction in both time and money. In fact, the letters that came out from the First Presidency over the last years, one of them issued five times, for instance, emphasizes the reduction in the time required of Church members first, not just the money.

Commercial Substitutes

    Something else we must watch: already there grows up commercially oriented activities. Resourceful members of the Church saying, "Well, if the Church is going to back off on this, we can provide that" and you can see the obvious. Be careful of those. Be alert to them; beware of them.

Tithes and Offerings

    When President Benson was a stake president, he wrote the First Presidency proposing that the Church be operated on tithes alone. It took him a little while to get it done. He said: "We will depend on tithing more than ever to finance the programs of the Church. That will be possible only as all our leaders and more of our membership are full-tithe payers." (President Ezra Taft Benson, Regional Representative Seminar, 2 April 1982)

    There should not be the slightest hesitancy to teach and preach and emphasize the principle of tithing. Tithing is a principle with a promise. Read Malachi. That statement "prove me now herewith, saith the Lord of Hosts, if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing that there shall not be room enough to receive it," those blessings come simply from bringing your tithes and offerings. And He said "neither shall your vine cast her fruit before the time in the field, saith the Lord of hosts." (See Malachi 3:10-11) This is a principle with a promise, and it is the door to the temple.

    The scriptures speak of tithes and of offering they do not speak of assessments or fund raising. To be an offering it has to be freely given, not assessed or requested.

Spiritual vs. Temporal

    Tithing is not so much a matter of money as a matter of faith. While the change in budgeting may seem at first to be a temporal matter, the effect of it will be spiritual.

    The Lord said that not at any time has he given either a law or a commandment which is temporal. (See D&C 29:34-35) Of course he has not! Temporal means temporary and, whether his laws govern the physical or the spiritual, his laws are eternal!

Bishop's Interviews

    Another "small thing" has happened, something unprecedented. You know that the guides and handbooks prescribe so many bishop's interviews and regulated the frequency of them that it would be literally impossible for a bishop to conduct them all without him having to neglect other things. Because of that, bishops often end up feeling inadequate or guilty.

    I will read a statement from the new Melchizedek Priesthood Handbook that Brother Hanks introduced to us. Listen carefully:

    "In large wards, the interviews of Aaronic Priesthood young men and young women may become burdensome. Bishops, acting with inspiration and wisdom, may wish to adjust their scheduling and frequency of interviews." Can you see the loosening up? "For example, some young members may need added attention while others may need less frequent interviews than are suggested. The bishop should interview priests and young women of corresponding age and may assign other youth interviews to his counselors. When a counselor encounters serious matters, such as transgressions that require confession, he should refer the member to the bishop without delay. Parents should be encouraged to stay close to their children allowing local Church leaders to act in a supporting role."

    Yesterday in our temple meeting we were talking about this and talking a little about the other meetings that the other meetings that the bishop is scheduled to be to. Every time there is a graduation or a change in something, they prescribe the bishop to be at the meeting. President Monson mentioned that when he was a bishop, he followed the practice that if the counselor had something to do with the organization, he said, "Well even though the handbook said the bishop should be there, you will be the bishop for that meeting!" There can be a delegation.

The Family

    Now, in conclusion, I once thought the family was unfairly neglected in the Church, particularly in the organization. We have Melchizedek priesthood quorums to foster the interest of men; the Relief Society for Sister. We have Aaronic Priesthood quorums for boys, young women for girls, primary for the children and so on. Each organization has general and local presidencies and quorums and boards.

    But for the family there is no such thing, not so much as a committee. The family has been everybody's business. Everybody's business, as we know, is nobody's business. I used to worry as we designed programs to fit the weak, unstable family, scheduling for men, women, children, youth, young adults, singles, everything, with too little attention paid to the effect it was having on stable families.

    I remember when some pressed for a written form so families could report their compliance with the family home evening program. We did not permit it. And to this day we have some who want to program formal interviews between parents and their children.

    I once wondered if we should create an agency to represent the family. But on more serious reflection, I changed my view. There are some things which cannot be counted and should not be programmed. Matters with deepest doctrinal significance must be left to married couples and to parents to decide for themselves. We have referred them to gospel principles and left them to exercise their moral agency. Serious problems often come voluntarily to their bishop. That is the best way.

    We cannot program individual and family prayer, indeed all of the basic human relationships, the emotional and the feelings, the bonds that bind man to woman and parents to children, all of the quiet influences, the sacred things that are centered in family life. The family is apart from and above the other organizations and under the sealing authority, more enduring than them all.

    While the family may suffer both neglect and intrusion because of our penchant to program everything, nevertheless, at the same time, the family has been protected. Therein lies a testimony of the genius of Church organization.

    I have but to ask one "what if" question to convince you of that. What if, in the correlation process, we had organized a general board of the family? The very thought of it sends chills of horror through my being.

    Now, you know why I feel as I do about this change.

    The world opened to us. We move now into developing nations and into nations liberated from slavery, not unlike the Israelites as they came from Egypt. Their wilderness will be one of poverty in both temporal and spiritual knowledge. We must not indulge them as we have indulged ourselves. If we do as we should, wherever there is a Latter-day Saint family, there the Church stands organized.

    Alma spoke also of miracles worked by small means, and he included a warning; "Nevertheless, because those miracles were worked by small means it did show unto them marvelous works." But, "they were slothful, and forgot to exercise their faith and diligence and then those marvelous works ceased and they did not progress in their journey." (Alma 37:41)

    Brothers and sisters, have you not heard that voice from the dust, the prophets of ancient times warning us, teaching us? Can we not now move into the future to meet the tremendous opportunities that are before us and taketh the gospel to every nation, kindred, tongue, and people, leaving much behind, not neglecting those fundamental doctrines, those fundamental gospel principles and ordinances. Then we will have acted in the offices to which we have been called with all diligence and the Lord will bless us.

    I bear witness that He lives, that this is his church, that it is led by inspiration and that his spirit is guiding us, in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.


Let Them Govern Themselves
Boyd K. Packer

1. Reduce and simplify -- course correction. Pres. Monson
2. Less concerned with fun and more with faith. Pres. Hinckley
3. Don't create additional programs.
4. Warning: Fast growth, accepted by the world, prosperous and popular.
5. Teach them correct principles "let" them govern themselves only safe course is to make sure they:

        * know the gospel
        * are acquainted with the scriptures
        * are acquainted with revelation
        * are acquainted with repentance
        * are acquainted with how the Holy Ghost functions
        * are acquainted with the voice of the Spirit

    --"a knowledge of right and wrong does not automatically result from programmed activities. It must be taught!"

    --Promise

"If we teach them correct principles rather than overburden them with too many instructions and programmed activities, they can be both free and spiritually safe in any nation, among any people, in any age."

6. Return the responsibility of teaching and counseling to the family -- resist the temptation to program the vacuum.
7. Shift budget emphasis from stake to wards.
8. Reduction of both time and money.
9. Teach tithing.
10. "Family is apart from and above the other organizations and under the sealing authority, more enduring than them all."